Inconsistencies in Biology Textbooks
My Biology 204 class gives me lots to think about, but one thing I've noticed is how the textbook for our class has continual snippets of self-contradiction. For example: At one point in the book the text used the example of the human appendix and homologous bone structures between species to disprove Intelligent Design. A few pages later there was a passage praising the incredible diversity among the kingdoms and crediting Evolution with having caused massive, diverse speciation.
It seems an illogical step to take a concept and it's opposite and use them both as evidence of one thing. It is odd to say that Evolution is responsible for how everything is fundamentally the same and at the same time wildly different.
Also--and you may blame my innate Creationist bias for this--if everything in a biological kingdom has a similar structure and design, it doesn't seem to me that this disproves anything. It could mean that, if the world was indeed created, someone up there found a design that was universally applicable and simply changed some bits around because the pattern was efficient and biologically stable.
Another problem I've noted in this same textbook is circular reasoning. Throughout the book there are phylogenic charts, or "trees of life." Judging by the text, scientists have drawn these trees based on hypothesis and theory, then done RNA testing to determine relationships between the species on the chart, and then referred back to the hypothetical tree to fill in the gaps in their RNA research.
That's my rant on Evolution today. Sorry, no alternative, scientific hypothesis yet. I'll keep working on it.